Jane Eyre Tour

20 Jul

It is a reasonably well known tale, orphaned child reluctantly brought up in disdain by Aunt, sent off to an ‘educational institution’ at the age on ten. Many years later the child as an adult is a teacher in the same institution, working for bed and board, wishing for something better. She secures a post of Governess at an isolated mansion for a child, where Jane for the first time has freedom, warmth from friendship, and a sense of inner contentment. When the master returns from his travels, his aggressive demeanour, their differing stations in life, her straightforwardness, fuel a tender passion. But there is a heavy secret, locked in the attic is his mad first wife. When Jane discovers the truth she runs away from the lies and the liars as well as trying to distance herself from the distress and disappointment, however something draws her back, and when she returns she finds the mansion in ruins and Mr Rochester blinded from injuries. 

Both my sister and I had seen several adaptations of this classic Charlotte Brontë story.  As this was a National Theatre production we knew it was not going to be the traditional theatrical setting, however as we took our seats the stage was set with what looked like a grown-up sized childs playground climbing frame. Slowly the auditorium began to fill but with just five minutes before curtain up, there were still more than half the seats vacant. The complete cast of 12 took up their starting positions.  Whilst the dialogue, accents and costume stayed close to the original story, the staging was contemporary and sometimes difficult to properly grasp its concept and symbolism. The introjection of music and singing sometimes felt disconnected. By the third act seeing the quiet cast move and climb up and down the various ladders and stairs without seemingly purpose, became rather annoying and children climbing in the playground.

This in no way means the performance was bad. The actors did a brilliant job of portraying the various characters, and by far the most enjoyable was a bearded gentleman who played the part of Pilot the dog, who often raised a mild laughter from the audience with his instantly recognisable dog like antics. The actor portraying the arrogant Mr Rochester brought with it a sense of distraction, of brooding resentment of how his life had been mapped out for him by his father without making him evil or wicked.

For us the thing missing from the production was the sense of a sinister secret. In everything we have seen or read there was always a sense of foreboding, of Jane being told not to go into the attic, of sounds and happenings that indicate all is not right. There was absolutely none of this at all throughout the whole performance, only twice was manic laughter heard. For us it was a significant element that was missing.

With a mixture of live music and recorded sound effects these had a tendency to drown out the dialogue of the actors, and on occasion I felt I had missed a vital piece of information that carried an element of the story. This is not unique to this production but something I have experienced at other performances at this Theatre.


Posted by on July 20, 2017 in Books, Films, Review


Tags: , , ,

6 responses to “Jane Eyre Tour

  1. menhir1

    July 20, 2017 at 4:07 pm


    I take it this was not a pre-run show, like a series of rehearsals for tweaking, but an actual full public staging. If so, it does sound like a half-baked attempt to re-write the essence of this varied period piece story line. I enjoy imaginative staging, some minimalist work can be amazing, but, the essential elements are usually there…that is, of course, the clever production bit.

    Pity it was all a bit empty, like the theatre.


    Liked by 1 person

    • AnneMarie

      July 20, 2017 at 4:11 pm

      Yes, this was after a long run at the National. I guess it’s like abstract art, you either see it or you don’t. When a cast member walks on, climbs the steps, walks across the gangway, climbs down and walks off, while others are performing, it distracted and did not add any meaning or purpose to that piece.



  2. Bushka

    July 20, 2017 at 4:43 pm

    Mmmm….I’m not sure I would enjoy such a version of the tale…. 😦 Hugs!

    Liked by 1 person

    • AnneMarie

      July 20, 2017 at 5:28 pm

      We both had mixed feelings, elements we enjoyed and elements that annoyed and elements we just didn’t understand. But like I said, it was not a bad performance.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Me

    July 21, 2017 at 4:01 pm

    I haven’t been to any theatrical shows since my teens so I likely wouldn’t know good production from bad. I also have heard the name Jane Eyre, but know nothing of the storyline other than what you’ve mentioned here. It’s not something I have any real familiarity with. Sorry it was a let down. Still hope it was a worthwhile outing. Has to be better than working. 🙂


  4. deacongill

    July 23, 2017 at 2:21 pm

    It’s usually fun going to a play which is projecting a different take on a well-known story, even if we don’t like it! I’m the same with TV adaptations – I was enraged with the cartoon treatment of the Durrell stories, which the TV writer created himself, when there are so many bewitching and informative and very funny stories in the books themselves. I stopped watching!

    Liked by 1 person


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: